Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

Marine and coastal ecosystem services on the science–policy–practice nexus: challenges and opportunities from 11 European case studies

Evangelia Drakou 1, 2 Charlène Kermagoret 1 Camino Liquete 3 Ana Ruiz-Frau 4 Kremena Burkhard 5 Ana Lillebø 6 Alexander van Oudenhoven 7 Johanna Ballé-Béganton 1 João Garcia Rodrigues 8 Emmi Nieminen 9 Soile Oinonen 9 Alex Ziemba 10 Elena Gissi 11 Daniel Depellegrin 12 Kristina Veidemane 13 Anda Ruskule 13 Justine Delangue 14 Ana Böhnke-Henrichs 15 Arjen Boon 10 Richard Wenning Simone Martino 16 Berit Hasler 17 Mette Termansen 17 Mark Rockel Herman Hummel 18 Ghada El Serafy 10 Plamen Peev
1 AMURE - Aménagement des Usages des Ressources et des Espaces marins et littoraux - Centre de droit et d'économie de la mer
2 University of Twente [Netherlands]
3 JRC - European Commission - Joint Research Centre [Ispra]
4 IMEDEA - Institut Mediterrani d'Estudis Avancats
5 LUH - Leibniz Universität Hannover [Hannover]
6 Universidade de Aveiro
7 Universiteit Leiden [Leiden]
8 USC - Universidade de Santiago de Compostela [Spain]
9 SYKE - Finnish Environment Institute
10 Deltares [The Netherlands]
11 IUAV University Venice
12 ISMAR - Istituto di Science Marine
13 LU - University of Latvia
14 IUCN - International Union for Conservation of Nature
15 WUR - Wageningen University and Research [Wageningen]
16 SAMS - Scottish Association for Marine Science
17 ENVS - Department of Environmental Science [Roskilde]
18 NIOZ - Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research
Abstract : We compared and contrasted 11 European case studies to identify challenges and opportunities toward the operationalization of marine and coastal ecosystem service (MCES) assessments in Europe. This work is the output of a panel convened by the Marine Working Group of the Ecosystem Services Partnership in September 2016. The MCES assessments were used to (1) address multiple policy objectives simultaneously, (2) interpret EU-wide policies to smaller scales and (3) inform local decision-making. Most of the studies did inform decision makers, but only in a few cases, the outputs were applied or informed decision-making. Significant limitations among the 11 assessments were the absence of shared understanding of the ES concept, data and knowledge gaps, difficulties in accounting for marine social–ecological systems complexity and partial stakeholder involvement. The findings of the expert panel call for continuous involvement of MCES ‘end users’, integrated knowledge on marine social–ecological systems, defining thresholds to MCES use and raising awareness to the general public. Such improvements at the intersection of science, policy and practice are essential starting points toward building a stronger science foundation supporting management of European marine ecosystems.
Document type :
Journal articles
Complete list of metadata
https://hal.univ-brest.fr/hal-01939772
Contributor : Séverine Julien Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Thursday, November 29, 2018 - 5:12:57 PM
Last modification on : Wednesday, October 27, 2021 - 8:44:33 AM

Links full text

openaccess

Identifiers

Collections

UNIV-BREST | CNRS | UMR-AMURE | IUEM | INSU | USPC

`

Citation

Evangelia Drakou, Charlène Kermagoret, Camino Liquete, Ana Ruiz-Frau, Kremena Burkhard, et al.. Marine and coastal ecosystem services on the science–policy–practice nexus: challenges and opportunities from 11 European case studies. International Journal of Biodiversity Science Ecosystem Services and Management, Taylor & Francis, 2018, 13 (3), pp.51-67. ⟨10.1080/21513732.2017.1417330⟩. ⟨hal-01939772⟩

Export

BibTeX TEI DC DCterms EndNote

Share

Metrics

Record views

163