Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. - Université de Bretagne Occidentale
Journal Articles New England Journal of Medicine Year : 2011

Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

Manesh R Patel
  • Function : Author
Kenneth W Mahaffey
  • Function : Author
Jyotsna Garg
  • Function : Author
Guohua Pan
  • Function : Author
Daniel E Singer
  • Function : Author
Werner Hacke
  • Function : Author
Günter Breithardt
  • Function : Author
Graeme J Hankey
  • Function : Author
Jonathan P Piccini
  • Function : Author
Richard C Becker
  • Function : Author
Christopher C Nessel
  • Function : Author
John F Paolini
  • Function : Author
Scott D Berkowitz
  • Function : Author
Robert M Califf
  • Function : Author
Non Renseigné
  • Function : Author

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of warfarin reduces the rate of ischemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation but requires frequent monitoring and dose adjustment. Rivaroxaban, an oral factor Xa inhibitor, may provide more consistent and predictable anticoagulation than warfarin. METHODS: In a double-blind trial, we randomly assigned 14,264 patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who were at increased risk for stroke to receive either rivaroxaban (at a daily dose of 20 mg) or dose-adjusted warfarin. The per-protocol, as-treated primary analysis was designed to determine whether rivaroxaban was noninferior to warfarin for the primary end point of stroke or systemic embolism. RESULTS: In the primary analysis, the primary end point occurred in 188 patients in the rivaroxaban group (1.7% per year) and in 241 in the warfarin group (2.2% per year) (hazard ratio in the rivaroxaban group, 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66 to 0.96; P<0.001 for noninferiority). In the intention-to-treat analysis, the primary end point occurred in 269 patients in the rivaroxaban group (2.1% per year) and in 306 patients in the warfarin group (2.4% per year) (hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.03; P<0.001 for noninferiority; P=0.12 for superiority). Major and nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding occurred in 1475 patients in the rivaroxaban group (14.9% per year) and in 1449 in the warfarin group (14.5% per year) (hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.11; P=0.44), with significant reductions in intracranial hemorrhage (0.5% vs. 0.7%, P=0.02) and fatal bleeding (0.2% vs. 0.5%, P=0.003) in the rivaroxaban group. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with atrial fibrillation, rivaroxaban was noninferior to warfarin for the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism. There was no significant between-group difference in the risk of major bleeding, although intracranial and fatal bleeding occurred less frequently in the rivaroxaban group. (Funded by Johnson & Johnson and Bayer; ROCKET AF ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00403767.).

Dates and versions

hal-01038111 , version 1 (23-07-2014)

Identifiers

Cite

Manesh R Patel, Kenneth W Mahaffey, Jyotsna Garg, Guohua Pan, Daniel E Singer, et al.. Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.. New England Journal of Medicine, 2011, 365 (10), pp.883-91. ⟨10.1056/NEJMoa1009638⟩. ⟨hal-01038111⟩

Collections

UNIV-BREST
62 View
0 Download

Altmetric

Share

More